New Publication: Neutrophil-mediated innate immune resistance to bacterial pneumonia is dependent on Tet2 function

https://bsky.app/profile/msmacrophage.bsky.social/post/3kubwknbcts2e
Click here for the full thread from Bluesky highlighting the major findings of the paper.
To see the full paper click here:
To see the commentary click here:



Bluesky thread:

Let me tell you about the #BowdishLab & friend’s most recent paper “Neutrophil-mediated innate immune resistance to bacterial pneumonia is dependent on Tet2 function”, led by Dr. C. Quin (now at @uniofaberdeen.bsky.social) @jclinical-invest.bsky.social https://www.jci.org/articles/view/171002
Tet2 is gene that is involved with methylating genes and therefore changing gene expression. Sometimes spontaneous mutations of Tet2 in hematopoetic stem cells (HSC) occur. These mutants tend to produce more myeloid cells (monocytes/neutrophils).
These myeloid producing HSCs tend to be more fit in the aging bone marrow (Darwinian survival of the fittest) and overtime, more and more of your myeloid cells are made from these Tet2 mutant clones.
In extreme cases this can lead to myelodysplastic disorders or cancer, but sub-clinical CHIP or clonal hematopoeisis of indeterminant potential occurs in many older adults.
People with CHIP (i.e., too many of their myeloid cells are made from Tet2 mutant progenitors) are prone to all sorts of conditions (e.g., heart disease) and pneumonia. We hypothesized that pneumonia risk might be due to changes in innate immune/myeloid cell function.
Mice defective in Tet2 did very poorly during Streptococcus pneumoniae infection (the most common cause of community acquired pneumonia in older adults), because their neutrophils were less able to kill bacteria.
We are excited about this @jclinical-invest.bsky.social publication because it is the first mechanistic explanation for the increased risk of pneumonia in CHIP. Generally CHIP is thought to affect macrophage function, but it clearly affects neutrophil gene expression & function as well.
Many thanks to Dr. Elsa Bou Ghahem for her most excellent Commentary https://www.jci.org/articles/view/181064 and for the great editorial & reviewer experience @jclinical-invest.bsky.social
Research Team:Candice Quin, Erica N. DeJong, Elina K. Cook, Yi Zhen Luo, Caitlyn Vlasschaert, Sanathan Sadh, Amy J.M. McNaughton, Marco M. Buttigieg, Jessica A. Breznik, Allison E. Kennedy, Kevin Zhao, Jeffrey Mewburn, Kimberly J. Dunham-Snary, Charles C.T. Hindmarch, Alexander G. Bick, Stephen L. Archer, Michael J. Rauh, Dawn M.E. Bowdish

Extra, Extra, Read all about it! The Bowdish lab elucidates the evolution of the class A scavenger receptors.

Congratulations to Fiona Whelan (MSc) for publishing her first manuscript “The Evolution of the class A scavenger receptors” in BMC Evolutionary Biology. The scavenger receptors are an evolutionarily ancient family of proteins required for host defence and homeostasis but teasing apart their function and even their structure has been challenging. The goal of this manuscript was to use evolution as a guide to discover how the class A scavenger receptor family was formed and to identify regions of conservation and hence probable functional importance for future study. Phagocytic receptors such as the class A scavenger receptors are integral members of the innate immune response, which is conserved in all classes of life and after reproduction and nutrient acquisition is probably the major most fundamental requirement for survival.

There are essentially only four basic mechanisms of the innate immune system – agglutination (e.g. lectins), lysis/neutralization (e.g complement, antimicrobial peptides), phagocytosis (e.g. scavenger receptors), and pro-inflammatory signalling (e.g. the toll like receptors). The fact that these processes are ancient and have been so strongly preserved is a testament to their importance. Of these, phagocytosis is likely the most ancient process and was probably adapted from its original purpose of nutrient ingestion . One might hypothesize that phagocytosis was truly the genesis of the immune system since our single celled ancestors had to distinguish  between “self” and “non-self” in order to distinguish between food and their own daughter cells.  From there phagocytosis became essential to fundamental processes such as embryonic development, pathogen recognition, and homeostatic clearance of senescent cells. Without phagocytosis, the transition to more complicated life forms could not have occurred.

Although there have been excellent evolutionary analyses of the lectins, toll like receptors and complement pathways, very little is known about the evolution of the phagocytic receptors. The class A scavenger receptors are an excellent example of these multifunctional receptors as they are involved in both host defence and homestasis. Since the phagocytic receptors in general and the scavenger receptors in particular are a diverse group of proteins,it has been challenging to understand how members within a group are related. Indeed, the first goal of this manuscript was to definitively demonstrate that the members of the class A scavenger receptors, which had been grouped together based on a ragtag combination of ligand binding and some degree of amino acid similarity, were actually a family at all.  Since we were able to trace a probable path of gene duplication and consequent functionalization, we are confident that the 5 members (SRAI/II, MARCO, SCARA3/4/5) are actually related.  Interestingly the class A scavenger receptors may have acquired their long stalk like form with a single scavenger receptor cysteine rich domain (SRCR) around the time of the evolution of fish since, although SRCR domain can be found in invertebrates and single celled organisms, we could not find anything that resembled a modern class A scavenger receptor in any genomes of evolutionarily more ancient organisms such as jellyfish, lampreys and insects.

Because elucidating the function of the specific domains of the scavenger receptors has been so challenging (even the function of the SRCR domain is unclear), ultimately we want to use evolution as a guide to which domains are functionally important (i.e. conserved). In this regard we found that there is a common conserved region in the collagenous domain, which in the type member SRAI, is believed to be the ligand binding domain. In addition conserved domains were identified in the cytoplasmic tail and the coiled-coiled domain. Future experiments will be performed to determine if these domains are necessary for structure, expression, cellular localization or phagocytic function.

The best part of our paper is that it is Open Access so you can enjoy reading it in provisional form today at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/227/abstract. If you have questions, comments or thoughts, please feel free to contact Dr. Dawn Bowdish at bowdish@mcmaster.ca or on her Google+ account. Dr. Bowdish is always interested in talking with undergraduate or graduate students interested in pursuing studies that use bioinformatics to answer questions about the scavenger receptors, phagocytosis, and structure/function relationships.

A summary of the common motifs in the class A scavenger receptor protein sequences. Conserved motifs present in the protein sequences of these receptors are indicated with coloured boxes at their approximate position within the protein with shout out boxes used to show the level of conservation across the aligned Homo sapiens sequences. From Whelan et al. BMC Evol Biol. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:227